DISCOVER
Research agents propose candidate control laws for uncertain, nonlinear dynamics and try to break them.
We build engineering tools that AI assistants operate directly, so an engineer and an assistant can do real analysis and design together. Alongside them, two research programs ask what those assistants can discover: control laws that hold up under test, and processors designed to run them.
The flight tools are available now. The two research programs are in their founding phase, so their pages describe aims, not results.
Trim, linearize, simulate and design control laws for an aircraft through the Model Context Protocol. Written in Rust, with no MATLAB or Simulink.
EXPLORE THE TOOLS →Can long-running AI research agents discover control laws that beat a strong, fairly tuned baseline on conditions they have never seen?
EXPLORE THE PROGRAM →Can AI agents design, verify and improve specialized processors for deterministic, low-power control, from RTL toward real silicon?
EXPLORE THE PROGRAM →The long-term aim is one engineering loop: research agents propose control laws, the flight tools test them against the evidence an engineer would demand, and the silicon program designs hardware to run the ones that survive.
Research agents propose candidate control laws for uncertain, nonlinear dynamics and try to break them.
Candidates fly in nonlinear simulation with turbulence, across Monte Carlo dispersions, and are rated against MIL-F-8785C flying-qualities criteria.
The silicon program explores fixed-latency, low-power processors to execute the control laws that pass.
The same rule applies across every program, whether the engineer is a person or an AI.
An engineering idea from an AI is a hypothesis until an independent test says otherwise.
We treat AI-generated engineering ideas as hypotheses, not accomplishments. The work demands explicit assumptions, independent tests, reproducible artifacts, and comparison with strong conventional methods. No performance claim is published without a traceable experiment.